搜索"Jean" ,找到 部影视作品
一天清晨某村庄的沟壕里出现了一具僵死的女尸。在警察的调查下,死者莫娜(桑德里娜•伯奈尔 Sandrine Bonnaire 饰)的流浪岁月由此被揭开。她身背大包四处露营,与落魄的流浪汉同居在一处房
天涯沦落女
导演:
主演:
剧情:
一天清晨某村庄的沟壕里出现了一具僵死的女尸。在警察的调查下,死者莫娜(桑德里娜•伯奈尔 Sandrine Bonnaire 饰)的流浪岁月由此被揭开。她身背大包四处露营,与落魄的流浪汉同居在一处房子里,一起抽烟睡觉。一个老妇人的女仆尤兰德满心羡慕莫娜和流浪汉的自在状态,不满男友保罗的简单粗暴。某夜保罗入室行窃打昏流浪汉,莫娜随即不辞而别。接下来她遇到了一对放牧的夫妇,他们给了她土地和住所,期望她能努力过上平静踏实的日子。莫娜不以为然重新上路,在路上搭便车结识了以研究树木为职业的兰迪尔,兰迪尔给予了莫娜短暂的帮助后两人便分道扬镳。此后莫娜又在途中结识了剪葡萄树枝的工人阿兹,无人知晓莫娜的流浪将把她引向何处……
亚历山大·达亚尔·德·渥姆斯高大英俊,是一位很受女性欢迎喜爱、充满魅力的男子,捎带着他也是启蒙运动之国-法国的外交部长。他有着银色浓密的鬓发、运动员般的体魄、略为黝黑的肤色,从纽约联合国的讲台到中
外交风云
导演:
主演:
剧情:
亚历山大·达亚尔·德·渥姆斯高大英俊,是一位很受女性欢迎喜爱、充满魅力的男子,捎带着他也是启蒙运动之国-法国的外交部长。他有着银色浓密的鬓发、运动员般的体魄、略为黝黑的肤色,从纽约联合国的讲台到中非战争一触即发的乌邦加地区,他的身影无处不在。在这些地方,他责问当权者、恳求伟人们,以带来和平、让那些好战者的神经平静下来,这些都证明了他头上那诺贝尔宇宙和平奖的光环。亚历山大·达亚尔·德·渥姆斯有着强大及随时准备战斗的头脑,遵从外交手段的圣三一原则:合法、明智及效率。他与新保守主义的美国人、腐败的俄国人及贪婪的中国人周旋。尽管世界配不上法国精神的伟大,但法国的精神艺术却感到被紧紧封闭在自己国内。年轻的法国国家行政学院毕业生亚瑟·弗拉曼克受聘外交部,负责外交部长的“发言”。就是说,他要为外交部长的讲话撰写发言稿!但他是否还需学会小心谨慎地写作及处理与部长周围工作人员的关系,在办公室主任与各位在外交部转来转去的顾问之间找到自己的位置,在这里,压力、野心和肮脏的把戏屡见不鲜......他在这里瞥见世界的命运,然而却也受到高级专家官员们官僚惰性的威胁。[by.沪江法语] Quai d'Orsay,这里用了时光网的翻译,作《奥赛站台》,其实是巴黎沿着塞纳河的一条路名,中文直译为:奥赛河岸。法国外交部位于这条路上,因而常指法国外交部。
影片讲述了女主人公娜娜(安娜·卡里娜 Anna Karina饰)如何从一名普通售货员走上卖淫道路的悲情一生。娜娜厌倦了售货员的生活,想要成为一名演员,可命运却让她陷入了出卖肉体的色情深渊。她越是深
随心所欲1962
导演:
主演:
剧情:
影片讲述了女主人公娜娜(安娜·卡里娜 Anna Karina饰)如何从一名普通售货员走上卖淫道路的悲情一生。娜娜厌倦了售货员的生活,想要成为一名演员,可命运却让她陷入了出卖肉体的色情深渊。她越是深入生命的深刻意义,越是怀疑生活的本来面目。命运辗转,就在她终于遇见她的爱人 时,命运又再一次跟她开了场玩笑,死在了皮条客的枪下。看似凌乱毫无关联的章节,充满哲理如呓语般的台词,为了“拯救灵魂而出卖肉体”么?影片抛掷给我们的又岂止是这一个问题。
19世纪,描写美与丑的文学作品风靡一时。“美”之古怪亮丽,有供人欢愉的脱衣舞会所,有病势严重的私生子,有麻木不仁的上层人士,有父亲之命的婚姻,还有未遂企图的凌辱糟蹋,以及其他。“美”之感情丰富,既
黄金国1921
导演:
主演:
剧情:
19世纪,描写美与丑的文学作品风靡一时。“美”之古怪亮丽,有供人欢愉的脱衣舞会所,有病势严重的私生子,有麻木不仁的上层人士,有父亲之命的婚姻,还有未遂企图的凌辱糟蹋,以及其他。“美”之感情丰富,既有美丽者如真爱,也有残酷者如恐惧与恨。被身处社会上层的爱人无情抛弃之后,可 怜的女人为了支付儿子的医药费,无奈旋舞于众人之前,卖弄色相。受迫于父亲之命,心早有所属的姑娘不得不面对即将于一位年逾古稀者结为夫妻的残酷现实。 摄于1921年,法国马塞尔·莱皮埃导演,片头字幕中特别注明:这是一出“闹剧”,表达了莱皮埃对汤玛斯·英斯那种平凡的轶事式的题材的轻视,他以标新立异的形式讲述了西班牙舞女西比拉的悲剧命运。莱皮埃从法国的印象派画家和美国的格里菲斯以及瑞典的斯约斯特约姆的艺术成果中吸取营养,把特技作为重要的电影表现手段。影片中精练而完美的摄影技巧,使西班牙的户外风景和室内布景协调一致,并对剧情发展到起重要作用。影片还探讨了艺术技巧抒发激情的方法。
二战末期,德国的反犹政策还在坚定不移地推行着。来自马赛的犹太孩子波奈特(拉法艾丽·弗托Raphael Fejtö 饰)因此家破人亡,被送到法国的学校念书。在这里,他一直小心翼翼的保守着他的秘密,但
再见,孩子们
导演:
主演:
剧情:
二战末期,德国的反犹政策还在坚定不移地推行着。来自马赛的犹太孩子波奈特(拉法艾丽·弗托Raphael Fejtö 饰)因此家破人亡,被送到法国的学校念书。在这里,他一直小心翼翼的保守着他的秘密,但还是因为新生的关系常常遭到同学戏弄。其中就有法国有钱家庭出身的朱利安(加斯帕尔·马奈斯Gaspard Manesse 饰)。 朱利安和波奈特成为了室友,在共同相处的日子里,朱利安发现,这个经常被欺负的男孩有着跟自己志趣相投的一面。两人的关系渐渐融洽,成了童年要好的伙伴。当朱利安从种种迹象猜测出波奈特的犹太人背景时,他没有疏远波奈特,而且还帮忙隐藏这个秘密。也许在孩子的心中,政治世界在真挚的友谊面前显得太过渺小。 然而,大人的魔掌还是侵入了波奈特的人生,保护犹太孩子的神父和波奈特都被出卖了……
玛丽安娜(Renée Faure 饰)从小立志成为一名修女,而在偌大的修道院中,没有任何一个人对待上帝能有玛丽安娜这般虔诚,因此,玛丽安娜成为了修女们眼中的异类。对于同伴们的嘲笑和奚落,玛丽安娜并
罪恶天使1943
导演:
主演:
剧情:
玛丽安娜(Renée Faure 饰)从小立志成为一名修女,而在偌大的修道院中,没有任何一个人对待上帝能有玛丽安娜这般虔诚,因此,玛丽安娜成为了修女们眼中的异类。对于同伴们的嘲笑和奚落,玛丽安娜并不在意,侍奉着上帝的每一天都让她的内心感到无比的宁静和快乐。 某一天,这种宁静被打破了,她听见了上帝的声音,让她帮助名叫泰莱斯(Jany Holt 饰)的女人。泰莱斯是一个妓女,犯了谋杀罪行的她为了逃避惩罚躲入了修道院中。对于玛丽安娜的照顾和关怀,泰莱斯置若罔闻,在内心里,她甚至不相信上帝的存在。终于,警察来到修道院逮捕了泰莱斯,玛丽安娜伤心欲绝。被逐出教会的她依然日日躲在教会后面的树林里祷告,终于患上不治之症。临死前,泰莱斯被带到玛丽安娜的跟前,在她憔悴虚弱的脸上,泰莱斯仿佛看见了上帝,也看见了自己的罪孽。
Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness an
纽约夜月情
导演:
剧情:
Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...

